[IDNO] - Was: Re: [ga] Reform in the GA?

["Roberto Gaetano" <ga_chair@hotmail.com>]

Andy Gardner wrote:

>
>A number of us consider this relevant to the GA>
>
>If you don't respect our opinions, and learn how to filter your email.
>


A number of people (much larger, according to my personal estimates) 
considers this irrelevant to the GA, though, so a solution should be found. 
The suggestion of activating personal filters is indeed agood one, but how 
on earth could people guess that IDNO-related bickering is disguised in a 
message whose subject line reads "Reform in the GA?"?

Pending decision by the List Manager on whether the issue of 
what-really-happened-in-IDNO (which is a completely different thing from the 
issue of a constituency for individuals) is on-topic or off-topic, I would 
suggest that all messages deling with the history of IDNO, the 
interpretation thereof, the attempt to rewrite it with different words, and 
all the alike clearly contain the string "[IDNO]" in the subject.
This will allow the people that consider this relevant to read it, and the 
people who consider this irrelevant to filter it. With this embedded string 
things will be clear, and readers can make a responsible choice.

Fair enough?

Regards
Roberto


_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html