Re[4]: [ga] GA Chair

["William X. Walsh" <william@userfriendly.com>]

Hello Joanna,

Tuesday, February 27, 2001, 10:27:23 PM, Joanna Lane wrote:

> Hello William,
> I disagree. For a start, all members of the GA should be under
> consideration. That's the democratic way. Second, I cannot imagine Eric
> Dierker ever referring to a colleague as "this person", or by any derogatory
> term. That would be one good reason to consider his candidature seriously.
> IMHO Eric has demonstrated consistency in a fair and even handed approach to
> those with opposing viewpoints to his own, whilst having the courage to come
> forward with well founded proposals based on a thorough understanding of the
> issues through independent research. Added to that, I believe he is both
> willing and able to take on the role and last but not least, he is nobody's
> fool.
> What exactly is your point?

I think you must have this Eric confused with another.

"Fair and even handed" ?

Sorry, Joanna, but that one doesn't fly.  His own posts will evidence
that.  Read the archives.

Just because someone has made some constructive posts is not a basis
for saying they have the necessary leadership qualities to chair the
GA.  The balance of their exhibited behavior, not to mention the
stated commitment to similar actions in the future (which shows that
there is in fact no real remorse over those initial actions),
definitely overshadow anything else.

He can be a constructive member of the GA, and constructively offer
his proposals without being the GA Chair, a position for which he is
clearly unsuited.

-- 
Best regards,
 William                            mailto:william@userfriendly.com


--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html