Re: [ga] New TLD Agreements

[Sandy Harris <wtfm@storm.ca>]

'Kent Crispin' wrote:
 
> William X. Walsh wrote:

> > Anyone, and I mean ANYONE, who claims that the UDRP is a fair and
> > legitimate process is either blinding themselves to the facts, or has
> > a definite bias which is making them present the facts in an incorrect
> > manner.
> 
> Actually, it is you who has a definite bias.

Of course William has a bias. Don't we all? Based on some of his posts, I'd
say that bias sometimes blinds him to the facts. (but then there's the question
of whether the facts are actually as I see them, and then we start talking about
my bias and ....)

However, here I'd say he's obviously correct.

Any procedure that could take the bodacioustatas.com complaint seriously (let
alone rule in the plaintiff's favour, as the WIPO arbitrator did!) is broken.
It grants trademark holders "rights" they do not have in law anywhere, then
"protecs" those "rights" through a flawed procedure.
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html