<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: Re[6]: [ga] let's focus on making sure that, in the various forums, we can as k substantive questions
Let's not rule out taking broad consultation on this. Especially if the .net
could be spun off as a competitor ...I am not expressing an opinion, merely
suggesting that one should be open. And that the views of those who are
registrants, plus those who might register are as/more relevant than those
of us who are merely "watching".
:-) Marilyn
-----Original Message-----
From: William X. Walsh [mailto:william@userfriendly.com]
Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2001 10:41 PM
To: Cade,Marilyn S - LGA
Cc: Joop Teernstra; Kent Crispin; ga@dnso.org
Subject: Re[6]: [ga] let's focus on making sure that, in the various
forums, we can as k substantive questions
Hello Marilyn,
Saturday, March 03, 2001, 7:35:45 PM, Cade,Marilyn S - LGA wrote:
> Not clear that I could agree with you, William, since I would think that
> industry stakeholder consultation and input would be needed on that topic.
> So, maybe you are right, maybe I am right, but more consolation is
> definitely called for! Ever the Internet way, right/
Sorry, Marilyn, but any solution which provides for such a major
change in the registrant policy for a TLD is not the "Internet way."
If you do not see that such a "solution" is inappropriate, then I
suggest you take another look at it. The existing use for .org has
been long held and well established. Such a major change at this late
stage is irresponsible, and is most certainly against the "internet
way."
--
Best regards,
William mailto:william@userfriendly.com
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|