Re: [ga] DNSO role in DNS policy

["Roberto Gaetano" <ga_chair@hotmail.com>]

Kent Crispin wrote:
>On Thu, Mar 01, 2001 at 09:17:05PM +0000, david@farrar.com wrote:
> > But more importantly the bylaws are absolutely clear that the Board 
>*must*
> > refer these proposals to the DNSO which shall initially consider them 
>and
> > recommend for or against them to the Board.  Clauses (e) and (f) make
> > it clear that the Board should not adopt any policy change unless the SO
> > has recommended it (unless it has been referred back to SO at least
> > once)
>
>Clause (g) makes it clear that the board can act regardless of clauses
>(e) and (f).
>


I'll buy that, the board can act regardless clauses etc...
I think it would be interesting to check the audience on whether it would be 
good to do so.

I'm not arguing with either part, I'm just trying to move from the legalese 
to the pragmatic, and ask whether a feedback from the DNSO community would 
be a *good thing*.
Then, of course, the board will decide. But I would not pass on the chance 
to give the opinion.

Whatever that may be.

Regards
Roberto


_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html