Re: Re[3]: [ga] let's focus on making sure that, in the various forums, we can ask substantive questions

["Roberto Gaetano" <ga_chair@hotmail.com>]

William,
>
>I am concerned that items are being placed on the agenda to deal with
>at the F2F without any prior discussion on the list of the same
>issues.  The F2F should be used to cement or work out differences
>regarding issues that have been vetted here, and if any concerns about
>the election process exist, they have not been put forward here.
>

Exactly my concern.
If we open the floor for subjects like the VeriSign contract, not discussed 
on the list so far (consider that from Europe some people are already on 
their way to Melbourne for the 2001-03-09 meeting on AtLarge), we take a 
huge risk of losing time.
The item of the elections is a different thing. I would like to have it on 
the agenda for having a (possibly consensus) motion passed, and give the 
sign that the GA is fully behind the election procedure.
I hope, with Jonathan, that this will not eat up much time, but it should be 
there.

Regards
Roberto

_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html