<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[ga] Re: Board descisions
- To: svl@nrw.net, svl@nrw.net, apisan@servidor.unam.mx, Amadeu@nominalia.com, karl@cavebear.com, jcohen@shapirocohen.com, phil.davidson@bt.com, f.fitzsimmons@att.net, ken.fockler@sympatico.ca, mkatoh@wdc.fujitsu.com, mkatoh@wdc.fujitsu.com, hans@icann.org, shkyong@kgsm.kaist.ac.kr, andy@ccc.de, junsec@wide.ad.jp, quaynor@ghana.com, roberts@icann.org, helmut.schink@icn.siemens.de, linda@icann.org
- Subject: [ga] Re: Board descisions
- From: vint cerf <vcerf@MCI.NET>
- Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2001 12:21:56 -0500
- Cc: ga@dnso.org, ecdiscuss@ec-pop.org, core@corenic.org
- In-reply-to: <01K0YJC5E4YWA0UDLO@shoe.reston.mci.net>
- References: <5.0.2.1.2.20010308130157.05091560@shoe.reston.mci.net><01K0YCO9QGFCA0UDLI@shoe.reston.mci.net>
- Sender: owner-ga-full@dnso.org
the success here had nothing to do with divestiture but rather to do with
opening of competition; competition would continue and would even be
enhanced in the new proposal as .org would be spun off, .net would be
spun off, and .com would remain. Since the erosion of market share
was not a consequence of spinning off the registrar but of allowing
other registrars to register in .com, .net and .org, there does not
seem to be much value in spinning off the registrar.
vint
At 09:34 PM 3/8/2001 +0100, Siegfried Langenbach wrote:
>about the stats ? not really ( I was a statistician half my life and
>know that can only trust on my on stats :-))
>so the question is : why cancel the rules which had the success
>they were made for ? because of the success ?
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|