RE: [ga] New contracts

[edierker@hi-tek.com]

I have found absolutely no support for the propostion of sticking to a tight 
timeline.  Touton's remarks that the parties would simply not agree, was 
proposterous and said while the Versign rep. was quickly leaving the NC meeting 
before it's conclusion. Would someone with direct ties please ask the DoC what 
thier position is regarding timing?
Sincerely,

There are three principle parties involved with the contracts and I consider
the ICANN Board itself has been put on the spot a bit with this issue.  I
consider the ICANN staff and legal representatives have some sharp questions
to answer to with regards to the timing on this proposed contract.

It is up to those in the DNSO who feel strongly on this matter to make sure
the ICANN Board is made aware of their concerns.

Darryl (Dassa) Lynch.

--
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html