ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-full]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] Melbourne board resolution


>Melbourne board  resolution.
>To allow the at large study committee to enlarge itself with additional
>skill sets.
>
>IMHO a wise decision.
>
>They are seeing the writing on the wall.

Let's hope so.

I found it interesting that they didn't feel the need to put any specifics
regarding "geographic/ethnic diversity" in because it's already in the
by-laws.

With ICANN BoD's displayed propensity to re-write the bylaws to suit them,
I'd feel much more comfortable seeing specifics required in any resolutions
they pass to safeguard against this, or else a simple re-write of the
bylaws could change aspects of everything they've done so far.

-- 
Andrew P. Gardner
barcelona.com stolen, stmoritz.com stays. What's uniform about the UDRP?
We could ask ICANN to send WIPO a clue, but do they have any to spare?
Get active: http://www.domain-owners.org http://www.tldlobby.com
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>