RE: [ga] the physical GA and the Names Council (Melbourne)

[Alexander Svensson <alexander@svensson.de>]

J J Teernstra wrote on 13.03.01, 02:31:16:
> At 13:34 12/03/01 -0500, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
>>Joop,
>>
>>A correction:  There was one vote of opposition on the NC (mine) and at
>>least 5 abstensions.  Obviously, the motion still passed.
>>
>>Chuck
>
> Yes, it did. Thanks for the correction. Sorry that I missed your AGAINST vote.
>
>    Who were all the abstainers? Could you list them?

According to the Scribe Notes, this seems to have 
been the vote:
http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/icann/melbourne/archive/scribe-icann-031101-nc.html

AGAINST:
Gomes (gTLD Registries)

ABSTAIN:
Stubbs (Registrars) 
Swinehart (Business) 
Carey (IP)
Chicoine (IP; via Carey's proxy)
Aus der Muhlen (IP; via Carey's proxy)

which leaves FOR:
De Blanc (ccTLD) 
Porteneuve (ccTLD) 
Robles (ccTLD) 
Park (NCDNHC) 
Mueller (NCDNHC; via Martinez' proxy) 
Martinez (NCDNHC) 
Kane (Registrars) 
Roberts (Registrars) 
Hotta (ISP/CP) 
Harris (ISP/CP) 
Forsyth (Business) 
Sheppard (Business) 
Schneider (ISP/CP) 

Best regards,
/// Alexander
_______________________________________________________
  ICANN Channel              http://www.icannchannel.de
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html