ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-full]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] Re: Board Decisions


On Thursday, March 15, 2001 5:41 AM (my local time)
Chuck Gomes <cgomes@verisign.com> wrote:


> As has been made abundently clear many times already, VeriSign is fully
> prepared to proceed with the terms of the existing agreement and are ready
> to do so.  Option B just presents another choice that wasn't there before.
> The fact that there is little time left would be a weak reason to reject
> Option B if indeed it was better for ICANN and the Internet community.  It
> really shouldn't be that hard in the next two plus weeks to careful evaluate
> the merits of B.

Hi Chuck

How are you?  Glad to see you back safely :-).

You are making a very logical point.  Regardless of the time-tabling it is
incumbent on all of us to evaluate the two proposals on their merits.

If Plan A's better, choose A.  If Plan B's better, choose B.
If you can't choose, for whatever reason, then it defaults to A.

Anything less would be a betrayal of trust placed in us by the internet
community.

Best regards
Patrick


--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>