ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-full]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] Re: Board descisions


On Wed, 14 Mar 2001 14:13:51 -0500, you wrote:

>It is my understanding that the reason for a late start in the negotiations
>of a new agreement had to do with the fact that there did not seem to be any
>realistic chance of accomplishing such a task.  There was not to my
>knowledge any intential effort to delay the process.  In fact, delaying it
>had very negative consequences for us in the investment community.  The
>sooner there is clarity in this regard the better for us.
>
>Keep in mind, we were pursuing a path of complying with the existing
>agreement and were very close to finalizing tasks related to that.

Chuck - can you (or someone who knows) clarify whether Verisign
approached ICANN with a proposal to change the existing contract, or
ICANN staff approached Verisign and when this contact first happened?

DPF
--
david@farrar.com
ICQ 29964527
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>