Re: [ga] competition ?

[Jefsey Morfin <jefsey@wanadoo.fr>]

Dear Peter,
If you consider what *you* could do in the best VeriSign interest
should you be in Stratton Scalvos seat, I think that Plan B is
a correct way for VeriSign to better make sure that their market
share does increase a lot and DN price stabilizes around $20.

On 11:01 18/03/01, Peter de Blanc said:
>Presumably, VeriSign will have little to do with this area, except possibly
>as one of many registrars in the game.
>
>Does anyone think their (VeriSign's) market share will decrease with new
>gTLDs in the marketplace?
>peter de Blanc

I am sure you can come with more action plans in Plan B to that
end than in Plan A. But that in any case the size effect of VeriSign
and their common (with the Staff) direspect for the bylaws (VeriSign
is a Member of the gTLD Constituency) may lead to think that Plan
B is just helping them more than plan A to become faster, to the
Intenet, what ATT is to telephone, IBM to computers and MicroSoft
to microcomputers. This is why I say this should fall under anti-Trust
scrutiny and GAC approval.

Jefsey

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html