ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-full]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] Re: Board descisions


At 03:12 AM 3/18/2001, Roberto Gaetano wrote:
>I do agree with you on the first part, but going further with the 
>reasonment, I would assume that one person with the experience of Vint 
>would have found a polite way to make the remark, would he have been 
>willing to make clear (to Verisign and to the Internet community) that the 
>future of .org is only determined by ICANN, and is not part of the negotiation.
>
>Having not seen that, I may suspect that this *is* indeed part of the deal.

It isn't.

I had a discussion with Vint about this, in Melbourne.

When people go to school to learn to write and express themselves, the 
focus in on learning to say what you mean.  In a politicized environment 
like ICANN, the style of public speech needs something entirely 
different:  Statements need to worry about protecting against what the 
speaker does NOT mean.

Think about how bizarre it is that you are willing to believe that 
something is true simply because Vint's wording was not specific enough to 
exclude it.

d/


----------
Dave Crocker   <mailto:dcrocker@brandenburg.com>
Brandenburg InternetWorking   <http://www.brandenburg.com>
tel: +1.408.246.8253;   fax: +1.408.273.6464

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>