<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[ga] Re: [icann-eu] Re: Proposed statement on Verisign contract revision
- To: ga@dnso.org
- Subject: [ga] Re: [icann-eu] Re: Proposed statement on Verisign contract revision
- From: Jefsey Morfin <jefsey@wanadoo.fr>
- Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 00:57:18 +0100
- In-Reply-To: <3AB6B338.F745D364@ix.netcom.com>
- References: <sab63337.010@gwia201.syr.edu>
- Sender: owner-ga-full@dnso.org
Jeff Williams points out the two missing points:
On 02:32 20/03/01, Jeff Williams said:
>Milton and all,
>#10 looks very good as stated. Well done Milton!
>Now for some additional amendments or clauses that might be or some
>interest with respect to the $200m and the $5m.... Any ideas on how
>these funds should be handled and also utilized?
1. it should be stated that the non profit organization will be publicly
set-up or selected as per rules established by the BoD after discussion at
the DNSO. It should also be stated that VeriSIgn will handle the M$ 5 to
the selected/publicly set-up .org managing non-profit and not the iCANN.
2. that the M$ 200 will be used in addition to the normal investement of
VeriSign and according to a budget to be reviewed by the concerned parties
(DNSO, PSO, ASO, Registrars, @large) and publicly agreed by the BoD. And
that it will serve to open competition and that developped softwares will
be under the GNU licence.
Jefsey
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|