Re[2]: [ga] ORG: some answers from ICANN

["William X. Walsh" <william@userfriendly.com>]

Hello Eric,

Friday, March 23, 2001, 11:28:19 PM, Eric Dierker wrote:

> I am sorry Mr. Walsh but you must back up these statements with at least a little
> bit of facts.  I have reread the faqs and I still challenge anyone to educate me
> on my assumption that this proposes no fundamental changes.

You can assume what you want, while they go ahead like they have in
the past and shut your legs out from under you.

Much like they did when originally every registrar was supposed to be
free to select their own dispute policies, but then in practice later
were forced to adopt the UDRP.

What they SAY and what they MEAN are two different things, and those
of us who are not new to the scene have learned to read ICANN-ese and
to tell when this is happening.

This is what is happening, the writing is on the wall, and has been
documented by many people showing the evidence.

You can refuse to see it, and issue your little challenges all you
want.

But all you are doing is helping them pull this off.

-- 
Best regards,
 William                            mailto:william@userfriendly.com


--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html