RE: Re[4]: [ga] ORG: some answers from ICANN

["Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <mcade@att.com>]

William, you are (or I am miscommunication)... misunderstanding my concerns.
My business units (some have less than 2m customers.. so let's not
misconstrue what my point was/is.

We can manage change for 2M Internet users, differently than change for all
100 M. That doesn't mean that I dismiss the concerns of the 2M. I don't.

Want to continue to argue this point, or have a constructive conversation.
Your call at this point.

Marilyn
-----Original Message-----
From: William X. Walsh [mailto:william@userfriendly.com]
Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2001 9:15 PM
To: Cade,Marilyn S - LGA
Cc: ga@dnso.org
Subject: Re[4]: [ga] ORG: some answers from ICANN


Hello Marilyn,

Saturday, March 24, 2001, 6:03:54 PM, Cade,Marilyn S - LGA wrote:

> William, I think that 2M matters, and that means that it will be
meaningful
> and important TLD. that's the point here. Sorry if you and I
> miscommunicated.

Correct, you said "that given 100M users, that 2M was such a large
percentage that change couldn't be contemplated"

Same thing, really.

Must be nice to work for a company like AT&T who can so easily dismiss
a market that even at the wholesale level is worth $12,000,000 a year,
and at least $40,000,000 at the retail level.

But please, what problem is it you see that needs a solution that
would even permit you to contemplate harming the interests of those
2,000,000 domain holders in order to solve?


-- 
Best regards,
 William                            mailto:william@userfriendly.com

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html