ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-full]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: Re[2]: [ga] ORG: some answers from ICANN


I do agree with you Roberto. Also, the UDRP itself permits the different 
pannel to propose additional features. Some may greatly change the UDRP.
Jefsey


On 09:49 25/03/01, Roberto Gaetano said:
>Marylin,
>>
>>One item where I disagree with your interpretation, but I can be wrong..
>>
>>I don't recall that ICANN was ever in a position to say that every registrar
>>would be free to have their own dispute resolution policies, based on the
>>input received in the White Paper process.  I didn't go back and research
>>it, but if my memory is right,  I believe it was a big issue from the
>>beginning that there be standard ICANN policies, which all accredited
>>registrars would adhere to, to prevent forum shopping. Selecting different
>>resources to implement the standard policies agreed to by ICANN for
>>accredited registrars is indeed a different thing.
>
>Off my memory, when the applications for the new TLDs were collected, one 
>of the information the applicant Registries had to provide was their 
>dispute resolution policy.
>This, IMHO, hinted the possibility of having different mechanisms for 
>different registries: otherwise, ICANN should have stated since the 
>beginning that everybody had to adopt UDRP.
>Even in the discussion about the individual applications, the point never 
>came up (incidentally, unlike the failure to separate Registry and 
>Registrar, that was criticized for IOD's .web).
>
>I still think that it will be a *good thing* to have different policies 
>for different TLDs. In a multicultural, complex world the "one size fits 
>all" is indeed often a simple solution, but seldom the best one.
>
>Regards
>Roberto
>
>
>_________________________________________________________________________
>Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
>
>--
>This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
>Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
>("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
>Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>