RE: [ga] GA position on Verisign contract

["Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <mcade@att.com>]

I thought that Roberto's original formulation was correct, based on the
polling language. 


-----Original Message-----
From: William X. Walsh [mailto:william@userfriendly.com]
Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2001 3:03 PM
To: Roberto Gaetano
Cc: philip.sheppard@europe.com; council@dnso.org; ga@dnso.org
Subject: Re: [ga] GA position on Verisign contract


Hello Roberto,

Sunday, March 25, 2001, 2:16:19 AM, Roberto Gaetano wrote:
> Moreover, should a charter be enforced by ICANN and/or agreed with the
.org
> registry (and this regardless on whether the registry changes owner, i.e. 
> independently from option A or B being chosen), the GA is opposed to any 
> action to cancel existing registrations. Any action of this type would be 
> contrary to the legitimate interest of bona-fide owners of .org names.


This should be changed to:

"the GA is opposed to any action that results in a change of
current registration policy for the .org TLD.  Any action of this type
would eb contrary to the legitimate interests of bona-fide owners of
.org names."

There may be a couple who disagree with that, but the overwhelming
numbers suggest this is the way the GA feels.


-- 
Best regards,
 William                            mailto:william@userfriendly.com


--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html