Quorum (Re: [ga] CORRECTION!!!)

[Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>]

At 19:27 25/03/2001 -0800, Kent Crispin wrote:
>The salient point here is that THERE IS A QUORUM RULE.  There is a clear
>definition of exactly how many people are participating, how they got
>there, and exactly how many of them it takes pass something.
>
>That is not the case here.

At the moment, the GA Assembly has 291 voting members 
(http://www.dnso.org/secretariat/rosterindex.html).

For a resolution, an absolute majority of the members who bother to vote at 
all must support the resolution (no minimum quorum).

For a rule change, a quorum of at least 20% or 100 voters (the smaller of 
the two) is required, and the vote must have at least 2/3 majority.

http://www.dnso.org/dnso/notes/2000.GA-voting-rules.html

We have rules.

(I also think that we have rough consensus on the contract issue, as 
Roberto reported. Even if we haven't voted on it yet).

--
Harald Tveit Alvestrand, alvestrand@cisco.com
+47 41 44 29 94
Personal email: Harald@Alvestrand.no

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html