<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] .ORG STRAW POLL
Joop, thank you for this hard work. I would prefer that all the questions begin
"are you in favor of". I become squimish about counting how things feel.
Joop Teernstra wrote:
>
> 1. Do you feel that .org should remain open and self-selected, as is the
> status quo at the moment. Yes[ ] No [ ]
>
> 2. Would you accept an enforced non-commercial charter for .org if
> guarantees were given that no current registration (a cut-off date needs to
> be specified) would be affected, ever? Yes [ ] No [ ]
>
> 3. Would you accept an enforced non-commercial charter for .org if NO
> guarantees were given that no current registration would be affected? Yes
> [ ] No [ ]
>
> Alternative formulations of these questions are most welcome. I can put
> them up in the Booth to alleviate list traffic.
> I agree with other GA members that the moment for making a pronouncement
> on .org is now. It is part and parcel of the Verisign contract issue.
>
I am not in favor of any contractual provisions which will have an effect one
way or the other on the integrity of the .org as it currently exists. (With that
said I do not believe they can, except in a staging for future debate manner.)
Any forewarning we can give to policy makers regarding altering the current
policy on .org should be of great assistance.
I am not in favor of any changes to .org.
Sincerely,
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|