ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-full]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] GA position on Verisign contract


Bill, May I call you that?

For some reason you miss the correlation between public input and what the government
can do.  I don't know why but for some reason I thought you were a moderately mature
American who had understood this concept.

I apologize for any assumption.  For anyone lost in this concept let me make it
perfectly clear; when we speak of the ability or legality of US gov. action it directly
relates to the open and obvious participation of the public, without that participation
it is considered notorious and illegitimate.

ICANN fortunate or not under the APA must follow the same rules.  And if they do not,
all of their actions are subject to revocation and or a finding of illegitimacy

"William X. Walsh" wrote:

> No one is talking about what the government can legally do and what it can't
> legally do, Eric.
>
> We are talking about whether it is appropriate or inappropriate for
> ICANN to do or consider doing.
>

Oh most definately we are good sir.

>
> --
> Best regards,
>  William                            mailto:william@userfriendly.com

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>