RE: Re[2]: [ga] GA position on Verisign contract

["Dassa" <dassa@dhs.org>]

|> -----Original Message-----
|> From: On Behalf Of William X. Walsh
|> Sent: Thursday, 29 March 2001 7:56 AM
|> Subject: Re[2]: [ga] GA position on Verisign contract
|>
|>
|> Hello Patrick,
|>
|> Wednesday, March 28, 2001, 7:57:09 AM, Patrick Corliss wrote:
|> > If you are going to change the charter for .org, you should do it
|> for .com also
|> > and make sure that the registrant is a registered commercial
|> organisation.  That
|> > would slow down the boom in dorcom sales and hurt Verisign in the
|> financial back
|> > pocket.
|>
|> Not to mention all the domain holders it would hurt.

True but if there is a push to reform one gTLD back to some semblence of
original purpose, the same conditions should be applied to all of them.  I'm
sure there would be enough negative feedback to quell any such intention if .com
was to be affected.

:)

Darryl (Dassa) Lynch.

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html