[ga] [Clarification] (1) WG-Review list (2) GA list

[DNSO Secretariat <DNSO.Secretariat@dnso.org>]

> From DNSO.Listadmin@dnso.dnso.org Wed Mar 28 11:26 MET 2001
> From: webmaster@myprayersite.org
> Date: 28 Mar 2001 01:26:21 -0800
> X-Sent: 28 Mar 2001 09:26:21 GMT
> Content-Disposition: inline
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> To: owner-wg-review@dnso.org
> Cc: webmaster@babybows.com
> Subject: Complaint by Jeff Williams
> 
> I have noted, on both the GA list and the WG-Review list, complaints that
> some participating members of the General Assembly are being denied the
> opportunity to participate on the WG-Review list.  Could you offer a
> clarification or insight into this process for the benefit of the
> membership?
> 
> Best regards,
> Danny Younger


1. With regard to Working Group lists:

   All Working Group lists are managed by the Co-Chairs, and not
   by the DNSO Secretariat.
   All subscriptions to WG-Review list are subject to approval by
   YJ Park. The DNSO Secretariat is not involved in that process.

2. With regard to GA ga list:

   The "Rules of Order for the Mailing Lists of the General Assembly 
   of the DNSO", in
   http://www.dnso.org/dnso/notes/2000.GA-ga-rules-v0.4.html
   has been voted and approved by the GA in November 2000.
   On the matter on ga@dnso.org list the Secretariat follows those
   rules, and is in charge only for technical matters.
   The technical problems with email addresses on the DNSO GA's 
   mailing lists are recorded in
   http://www.dnso.org/statistics/dnsotechproblems.html
   (access from the main page through "Number of participants in 
   the DNSO mailing lists over time")

DNSO Secretariat
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html