Re: [ga] .org poll

[Eric Dierker <Eric@hi-tek.com>]

No gentlemen It does not work that way;

This is an issue each potentiate should weigh in on.

I know that it is perfectly legal for the U.S. gov. to alter the conditions of a
contract and no one can claim detrimental reliance upon such promises made by
the U.S. gov.

But now enter the APA and it is not proper to make such alterations without due
process.  At the very least it requires RFPs.  And getting down to the gitty it
requires a whole lot of us effected to talk about it and get with it.

Well working backwords/ we ain't with it, we ain't talked about it, there ain't
been a process, Nobody has even tried to comply with the APA.

Finally it is not right to give someone something, or entice them to play a game
or business, and then change the rules, (a great example is Joanna and her beef
over the rule of ten).  Well those that bought into dotorg are entitled to
stability just like everyone else.


NEXT - MONOPOLIES ARE FOR DEVELOPING COUNTRIES &
            ISN'T IT GREAT HOW U.S. COURTS ARE RESOLVING ip
            DISPUTES.  AND INVITE EVRYONE TO WATCH "SHOULD
            THE GA CARE ABOUT THE ccTLDS"


Call me crazy but these are the current issues and if you people make me chair
we are going to deal with them.  So you better hurry and elect someone else.






Peter de Blanc wrote:

> roberto, et all..
>
> after names council and ccTLD work on verisign agreements, NC budget
> committee, and GA elections, plus my "day job", i can not give enought
> attention to .org issue to make substantive comment.
>
> Please let us re-visit that issue after GA elections, ICANN board decision
> on Verisign, and first "Rites of Spring" ;-)
>
> Peter de blanc
> chair, ccTLD AdCom
> ccTLD NC member
> NC Budget Committee
> ICANN Budget Group
> NC Business Plan Committee
> Teaching my dogs new tricks
> learning how to sleep on 15 hour airplane flights
>
> ( It is TOO MUCH!)
>
> peter
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ga@dnso.org [mailto:owner-ga@dnso.org]On Behalf Of Roberto
> Gaetano
> Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2001 6:37 PM
> To: ga@dnso.org
> Subject: [ga] .org poll
>
> Dear GA members,
>
> As promised, 'round midnight I counted the ballots for .org.
> Since my message that was indicating in 0/7/5+34 the split among,
> respectively, [change]/[no change]/[abstain], I received only half a dozen
> messages.
> This indicates clearly that the abstention party is still the vast majority.
> If I may draw any conclusion, it is that at this point in time the GA is
> focusing more on the election of its Chair, and that the discussion of this
> very important policy issue should be resumed after the elections.
>
> Best regards
> Roberto
> (P.S.: this is not an April Fool's message, it's a serious one)
> _________________________________________________________________________
> Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html