Re: [ga] serious participation in ICANN processes

[Eric Dierker <Eric@hi-tek.com>]

Kent Crispin wrote:

> On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 05:40:23PM -0800, Eric Dierker wrote:
>
> > > > The GA is not
> > > > to be dominated by, technocrats, bureaucrats, businessmen, lawyers or
> > > > lobbyists.  It is a General Assembly not any particular groups Assembly.
> > >
> > > In fact, the GA is not dominated by technocrats, bureaucrats,
> > > businessmen, lawyers, or lobbyists.
> >
> > This I do not know to be a fact.
>
> Which of the above classes do you belong to?
>
> --
> Kent Crispin                               "Be good, and you will be
> kent@songbird.com                           lonesome." -- Mark Twain
>

This in my mind is a fair question and for me poses no problem, as far as disclosure
goes.  Although I think that the average participant should not have to answer such
a question.  OTOH I do not understand why so many who participate here and work for
large corporations are so defensive about the reality of for whom they work. I
assume that is based in some history of which I am unfamiliar.

I work for a minimal wage, for Hi-Tek Mulitmedia. That is an Internet Marketing
company.  Believe it or not my most current assignments are writing policy for
countries developing their Informational Technology policies, and coordinating
educational programs for those same countries.  Of course I am not a career type
fellow so that could change tommorro.

Sincerely,

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html