<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [ga] serious participation in ICANN processes
> From: 'Kent Crispin' [mailto:kent@songbird.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 11:56 AM
>
> On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 07:52:24PM -0700, Roeland Meyer wrote:
> > > Sorry, that is simply incorrect. Said laws do not mandate a
> > > membership. It is perfectly legal to have a corporation without
> > > members.
> >
> > Not for a California non-profit.
>
> Sorry, that is incorrect.
>
> 5310. (a) A corporation may admit persons to membership, as
> provided in its articles or bylaws, or may provide in its articles
> or bylaws that it shall have no members. In the absence of any
> provision in its articles or bylaws providing for members, a
> corporation shall have no members.
>
> (from the california corporations code, in part 2, describing
> nonprofit public benefit corporations, visible at
> http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cacodes/corp/5310-5313.html)
See Karl's analysis;
http://www.cavebear.com/icann-board/platform.htm#full-members
BTW, Karl is a ICANN BoD member AND a lawyer.
--
ROELAND M.J. MEYER
Managing Director
Morgan Hill Software Company, Inc.
TEL: +001 925 373 3954
FAX: +001 925 373 9781
http://www.mhsc.com
mailto: rmeyer@mhsc.com
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|