Re[2]: [ga] serious participation in ICANN processes

["William X. Walsh" <william@userfriendly.com>]

Hello 'Kent,

Tuesday, April 03, 2001, 3:17:22 PM, 'Kent Crispin' wrote:
> So, bottom line, ICANN does not have members (as defined by the
> CNPBCL), and it is under no legal obligation to have them.  There 
> really is no question about this.

Nice to see you give legal opinions, but I think this matter will be
more likely to be settled in a court room when At-Large members sue
the ICANN BoD.

-- 
Best regards,
 William                            mailto:william@userfriendly.com


--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html