Re[2]: [ga] No Members?

["William X. Walsh" <william@userfriendly.com>]

Hello Kent,

Wednesday, April 04, 2001, 2:18:24 PM, Kent Crispin wrote:

> On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 12:41:40PM -0700, Bret Fausett wrote:
>> > California non-profits MAY have members, but they do not have to.
>> 
>> That's right. The reason for the continuing debate is that, under some
>> sections of California corporations law, corporations with statutory members
>> are defined by whether members have certain rights -- such as whether the
>> "members" can elect Directors, for example. But the creation of statutory
>> members under the California law is dealt with in several different sections
>> of the Code, some of which are seemingly contradictory, so it's a nuanced
>> question that we're unlikely to answer here.

> It is not nuanced at all.  The text is actually quite clear.

Only if taken out of context and read completely alone.

-- 
Best regards,
 William                            mailto:william@userfriendly.com


--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html