Re: [ga] ICANN benefits

[Dave Crocker <dhc2@dcrocker.net>]

At 11:18 AM 4/7/2001, Kent Crispin wrote:
>On Sat, Apr 07, 2001 at 02:04:44PM -0400, Sandy Harris wrote:
> > Also, multiple non-conflicting uses -- as in Sun Oil and Sun Microsystems,
> > both valid trademarks in at least the US -- should be explicitly allowed.
>
>It is.
>
> > The burden of proof for alleged conflict is on the complainant.
>
>It is.

ICANN-related discussion lists often must process comments and queries that 
are not really a matter of debate as they are a matter of basic 
education.  That is, the poster is concerned about understanding the actual 
terms and conditions of ICANN-related activities.

There will always be new people involved, needing to obtain detailed 
background about ICANN-related facts.

The question is how to provide them with the necessary material, short of 
saying 'go read the following mass of documents'?

Constantly having to go over basic material on these lists is extremely 
inefficient.

Any suggestions.

d/


----------
Dave Crocker   <mailto:dcrocker@brandenburg.com>
Brandenburg InternetWorking   <http://www.brandenburg.com>
tel: +1.408.246.8253;   fax: +1.408.273.6464

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html