Re: [ga] [Clarification] NC Proxies

[Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>]

DNSO Secretariat and all remaining assembly members,

  I don't recall a vote by the GA on this rule.  Is there a record of
GA members voting in favor of this rule?

  This rule seems pretty restrictive and non-standard form a marketplace
point of view....

DNSO Secretariat wrote:

> | >  from a practical point of view it shows that we should not elect NC-
> | >members which are not able to handle proxies :-)
> |
> | Proxies means that people who were not selected by their constituencies get
> | to represet their constituencies.
>
> The Rules of Procedure for the DNSO Names Council, adopted 26 Feb 2001,
> cf. http://www.dnso.org/dnso/notes/20010220.NCprocedures-v2.0.html
> state:
>
>    4. Proxies
>
>    4.1 Eligibility
>
>    Only elected Names Council members may cast a proxy vote on
>    behalf of another Names Council member.
>
> It is compliant with ICANN Bylaws:
> http://www.icann.org/general/bylaws.htm#VI-B
>
> DNSO Secretariat
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

Regards,

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 118k members strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number:  972-447-1800 x1894 or 214-244-4827
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208


--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html