<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] Call for a Working Group
On Fri, 13 Apr 2001, at 14:10 [=GMT-0700], Dave Crocker wrote:
> At 01:08 PM 4/13/2001, Kendall Dawson wrote:
> >I agree with Milton on this. The NC should create a Working Group to
> >explore this. Introduction of new colliding TLDs (especially .BIZ) should
> >be put on hold until this WG has a chance to explore the ramifications of
> >alternate or competing roots.
>
> 1. This is not a new topic. It has been around for years. Why is it only
> being pursued this late, with new ICANN registries about to be turned on?
On the internet a lot of things are decided, discussed at the last
moment under some healthy pressure. Remember the Verisign deal?
> 3. Why should the independent actions of registration activities of
> independent namespaces be of any concern
Because of collisions?
> to us?
Meaning "the ICANN community"?
> This is exactly the sort of activity that suggests an interest in endless
> debate than in providing users with new TLDs...
This is exactly the sort of argument to refuse any discussion one is
afraid to enter.
--
Marc Schneiders
------------------------
"The last temptation
is the greatest treason:
to do the right thing,
for the wrong reason."
(T.S. Eliot)
------------------------
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|