RE: [ga] Call for a Working Group

["Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <mcade@att.com>]

Okay, hopefully, unless retired, or otherwise  financially supported,
EVERYONE is employed by someone/entity/organization, company, etc. Can we
get past this particular issue and focus on work?

I may not agree with the proposed work, but that's a different issue. But I
don't support continual "harping" on issues, rather than work.

Is there work to be done?  If so, can someone outline it?

Then, Chris, Dave, Marilyn, and many others, can engage in productive
dialogue, even if we don't agree with each other.

...given that it's a week end (even given time differences, some of it is a
week end)  maybe a brief vacation from each other is in order. 

Here, I'll start it: I'm signing off until AFTER this week end.

Enjoy your family, neighbors, friends, etc.,  net-colleagues.  I intend to
do that myself. It's Spring here in the U.S., getting to fall in other
regions, and hopefully, a week end to enjoy, where ever you are.  

regards, Marilyn 



-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Crocker [mailto:dhc2@dcrocker.net]
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2001 7:22 PM
To: Christopher Ambler
Cc: ga@dnso.org; ga-abuse@dnso.org
Subject: Re: [ga] Call for a Working Group


At 03:01 PM 4/13/2001, Christopher Ambler wrote:
>It is to note that Dave is employed by NeuStar, and as such, has
>a vested interest in preventing such a working group, as his
>employer is a partner in the new .BIZ registry, the suggested
>topic of this working group. It is my belief that such an interest
>calls his arguments into question, at a minimum.

This is to note that Christopher is employed by a wanna-be registry and, as 
such, has a vested interested in preventing ICANN from implementing the 
decisions it has already made.

Now gosh, folks, wasn't this a productive exchange?  Let's question 
everyone's motives, everytime they post a note.  We certainly will get a 
lot done that way, won't we?

By the way, there is already one complaint against Chris' prediliction for 
raising personal concerns at every turn.  For those who are supposed to 
attend to such matters, please treat this as a second formal complaint.

d/

ps.  One small problem with Chris' analysis is that it is so convenient it 
ignores some rather important facts, such as the minor fact that I have 
been speaking against delays at implementing new TLDs for, perhaps, 4 
years, at least 3 more years than has involved Neustar.  Sigh.


----------
Dave Crocker   <mailto:dcrocker@brandenburg.com>
Brandenburg InternetWorking   <http://www.brandenburg.com>
tel: +1.408.246.8253;   fax: +1.408.273.6464

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html