<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [ga] I want to be on the Inclusivbe Name Space SIG ML
> From: Dave Crocker [mailto:dhc2@dcrocker.net]
> Sent: Friday, April 13, 2001 11:35 PM
>
> At 08:16 PM 4/13/2001, Sandy Harris wrote:
> >That's a contradiction. By definition, the "inclusive"
> namespace includes
> >ICANN's space plus others things,
>
> I have a chair. You have a chair. Is it possible to sit on
> a single,
> "inclusive" chair"
>
> There is no "inclusive" namespace.
Typical, when you can't use reason you use faulty analogy to declare a
conclusion. Where is your proof? Chairs are not names. However, I can call a
chair instance anything I like.
> What you are suggesting is that folks who have been
> independently running
> their own namespace should be given power to restrict ICANN's
> namespace.
Because it is an inclusive name space, they avoid existing names already.
The restriction goes both ways, quid pro quo. BTW, since you made this a
statement, I agree with it.
> That's not an "inclusive" namespace, it is restrictive, by virtue of
> restricting ICANN's choices over the namespace for which it
> has responsibility.
Your argument is not real coherent. But, essentially correct. ICANN cannot
infringe on an existing business. Welcome to the dark-side, Dave ...<g>.
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|