Re[2]: [ga] List Rules and Protocols

["William X. Walsh" <william@userfriendly.com>]

Hello Joanna,

Tuesday, April 17, 2001, 1:13:14 AM, Joanna Lane wrote:

> Not everybody was present when the rules were formulated, understands what
> they were "intended" to be or has the benefit of second sight.

> As set down, they seem to fairly vague:-

> With respect to personal privacy vs. professional disclosure.
> With respect to comments made about a person to add context vs. treating a
> colleague in a derogatory manner, etc..etc..

> This is not a criticism, but it is a proposal to add this topic to the
> agenda of items requiring clarification during the coming year, if only to
> reduce the burden on the ga-abuse complaints list.

> Translation into other languages might be good idea also.
 
And that is the proper way to address a perceived need to change the
rules, not for an alternate chair to take it upon himself to expand
them into what he sees as proper behavior.

-- 
Best regards,
 William                            mailto:william@userfriendly.com


--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html