ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-full]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] Sanctions


At 17:35 17.04.2001 -0700, William X. Walsh wrote:
>Hello Danny,
>
>BTW, you are wrong in your interpretation of the rules.
>
>You are required to issue a call for a limit of posts before there can
>be any such violation.
>
>You have issued no such call.
>
>"If the GA Chair or a list monitor asks for a limit to the nuber[sic] of 
>posts per person per day, this must be respected"
>
>The rule is only in effect if you have issued a call for such a limit.
>
>I have searched the archives to find such a call, to no avail.

http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/ga/Arc03/msg01536.html

The idea that a limit disappears when the chair is changed is fallacious.

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>