Re: Re[2]: [ga] [ADMIN] Suspension of William Walsh for mass postings

["Roberto Gaetano" <ga_chair@hotmail.com>]

William,

>
>Wednesday, April 18, 2001, 1:22:11 AM, Roberto Gaetano wrote:
> > where the List Monitor explicitely waived the 5-post-limit *for the
> > candidates to GA Chair* and *during the election week*.
> > Why would there be any need for waiving a limit, if the limit did not 
>exist?
>
>I was wondering the same thing.  I thought it was rather redundant of
>you, personally, since the limit was not in place.
>
>Had you issued a call for limits, that would be one thing.
>
>You never issued such as a call.
>

Please see http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/ga/Arc03/msg01536.html.
The call was issued and never revoked.
(or maybe you can provide us with a pointer that proves the contrary)


> > Anyway, the matter can be easily solved, we can ask DNSO Secretariat to
> > issue an automatic reminder of the rules periodically (monthly? weekly?
> > daily? evey hour? how long will a rule last if it is not reminded? - I'm
> > sure most will understand the point).
>
>That isn't the point.  The list rules state specifically that the 5
>post limit is only in place when the chair invokes it.
>


Again, please see http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/ga/Arc03/msg01536.html, and 
tell me what makes you think that it had to expire after a certain time? And 
if this is the case, after how long, and why?

Regards
Roberto


_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html