<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [ga] FUNDING
Good God, Dave! Can't you even read ONE page. Besides, I thought that you
claimed that you were familiar with the material?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Crocker [mailto:dhc2@dcrocker.net]
> Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2001 6:34 PM
> To: Bruce James
> Cc: [GA]
> Subject: Re: [ga] FUNDING
>
>
> There are 34 paragraphs on page 23, in 9 or 10 subsections.
> That is an
> enormous amount of text.
>
> It's certain that not all of them are relevant to supporting your
> claim. In fact, by my own reading, none of them support your
> claim, but
> again I invite you to be specific.
>
> The term specific, in this case is something like "Page 23, Public
> Charities, "This test is used to assure a minimum percentage..."
>
> I use that particular sample text because it has a formula
> that looks a
> little bit like the one you cite. Unfortunately a) that
> section does not
> apply to ICANN, and b) the requirement is not for 51%.
>
> But, what the heck, keep trying to demonstrate the validity
> of your claim.
>
> d/
>
> ps. I just realized that this posting is beyond the limit
> of 5 per
> day. I am sending it, rather than waiting, in order to try
> to provide some
> very concrete data that shows the flaw in the supposed
> problem with ICANN's
> tax-exempt status.
>
> At any rate, please forgive the excess. I won't
> post any more today.
>
>
> At 06:20 PM 4/21/2001, Bruce James wrote:
> >I hereby cite Page 23 of 55. For reading at you pleasure.
> There are other
> >parts you may read, feel free.
> >
> >If anyone would like a copy of IRS-PUB 557, I will be happy
> to forward one
> >to you.
> >
> >/Bruce
> >"Let us reason together."
> >
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Dave Crocker" <dhc2@dcrocker.net>
> >To: "Bruce James" <bmj@keyname.net>
> >Cc: "[GA]" <ga@dnso.org>
> >Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2001 20:02
> >Subject: Re: [ga] FUNDING
> >
> >
> >At 05:20 PM 4/21/2001, Bruce James wrote:
> > >Dave:
> > >
> > > I do sit on 3 non-profit Boards. This is a IRS
> requirement. Read Pub
> > >557. You will see I am correct with regards to 501(c)(3) standards.
> >
> >Citing an entire 55 page document does not provide provide
> substantiation.
> >
> >Bruce, you are carefully failing to provide substantiating
> detail. I wonder
> >why?
> >
> >You will see that you are NOT correct.
> >
> >Since you are the one putting forward a claim of
> mis-performance, you have
> >an obligation to provide enough detail to make clear that
> the claim is
> >valid.
> >
> >That does not mean just quoting a particular piece of text
> from an IRS
> >publication -- though you have not even done THAT. It also means
> >connecting the dots -- citing each of the relevant IRS
> qualifications or
> >dis-qualifications and relating them to relevant ICANN
> documents to show
> >their applicability.
> >
> >Somehow, the idea that your claim is correct, and that
> ICANN's attorneys
> >and accountants are not... well, it will be interesting to
> see you prevail
> >on the details.
> >
> >d/
> >
> >
> >----------
> >Dave Crocker <mailto:dcrocker@brandenburg.com>
> >Brandenburg InternetWorking <http://www.brandenburg.com>
> >tel: +1.408.246.8253; fax: +1.408.273.6464
> >
> >--
> >This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
> >Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> >("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
> >Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
> ----------
> Dave Crocker <mailto:dcrocker@brandenburg.com>
> Brandenburg InternetWorking <http://www.brandenburg.com>
> tel: +1.408.246.8253; fax: +1.408.273.6464
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|