Re: [ga] Re: Additional Mailing Lists

[k@widgital.com (Kristy McKee)]

I disagree with you Sotiris,

I think all the different Root services must begin to communicate 
now.  Many of them are already effectively communicating, our 
representatives are not participating and WE, the members of the group who 
are supposed to have a voice are screaming that many of us want our 
representatives to at the very least attempt to negotiate with all existing 
Root Administrators/Owners.  We have also communicated repetitively that we 
do not want the USG to create duplicate entries in the Master List for all 
Roots.  Some of our representatives have heard us and yet they are deaf to 
our pleas - we have a way to make them understand how important our 
Internet is to us and that we don't care for it to be segregated.

Thanks,

:)

~k

At 09:24 AM 4/22/2001 -0400, Sotiris wrote:
>With all due respect, Patrick, I think it would be wise to leave aside the 
>topic
>of competitive roots.  This, because  the competitive roots topic is 
>really not an
>ICANN relevant topic; the ICANN intransigence on competitive roots is firmly
>entrenched and IMHO it will take a miracle to get the BoD to even comment on
>altroots.  Afetr all, competitive roots are just that: competition.  As 
>far as I
>can see, the competitive root topic is a dead end at this point, one which 
>will
>waste much time and produce absolutely nothing substantive.  We all saw 
>how that
>discussion went recently on this ML, why let it happen again?  I think we 
>should
>stick to ICANN-related matters at this juncture.
>
>Sotiris Sotiropoulos
>
>
>Patrick Corliss wrote:
>
> > On Sunday, April 22, 2001 8:49 PM (AEST), Danny Younger wrote:
> > Subject: [ga] Re: Additional Mailing Lists
> >
> > > Hi Patrick,
> > >
> > > Please keep in mind my comment, "This proposed collection of lists will
> > > further be discussed by the General Assembly in the course of the 
> next few
> > > days".  The lists that I proposed are only a suggestion, and I am 
> expecting
> > > the GA to make up its own mind regarding the way forward with regard to
> > > these mailing lists.   You will note that many of the proposed lists 
> reflect
> > > the recommendations (motions) already put forward by the membership.
> >
> > Thank you, Danny.
> >
> > Perhaps the GA membership will consider whether they prefer five:
> >
> > (1)    [ga-ext]    External Relationships  (constituencies et al)
> > (2)    [ga-int]     Internal Processes  (list rules, elections etc.)
> > (3)    [ga-reg]    Registration  (whois, existing systems)
> > (4)    [ga-rts]     Competitive Roots  (alts & multilinguals)
> > (5)    [ga-tip]     Trademarks & IP  (UDRP & WIPO-2)
> >
> > eight:
> >
> > > a. Rules and Procedures of the General Assembly [rules]
> > > b. Participation, Website, Outreach and Education [outreach]
> > > c. Finance & Funding Support [funding]
> > > d. Ongoing DNSO Review [review]
> > > e. Individuals Constituency [ic]
> > > f. Alternate Roots [roots]
> > > g. UDRP & WIPO Recommendations [udrp]
> > > h. Privacy & WHOIS [whois]
> >
> > or some other model.
> >
> > As I understand it we are not just talking mailing lists but the whole 
> Working
> > Group set up including Chairs and secretarial support.
> >
> > Best regards
> > Patrick Corliss
> >
> > --
> > This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
>--
>This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
>Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
>("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
>Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html