<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] DNSO/GA Blocking and other concerns
At 5:53 pm -0700 4/21/01, Kent Crispin wrote:
>Motion 1: I move that the GA form a WG to examine the finances of each
>of the directors, and to recommend the removal of all directors with any
>conflicts of interest.
Seconded
>Motion 2: I move that the GA form a WG to examine the desirablitiy of
>turning ICANN into a for-profit corporation.
Seconded
>Motion 3: I move that the GA petition the NC for the immediate adoption
>of the GA as a constituency.
Seconded
>Motion 5: I move that the GA forward a resolution to the NC calling for
>the immediate suspension of the UDRP.
Seconded
This'll be fun.
--
Andrew P. Gardner
barcelona.com stolen, stmoritz.com stays. What's uniform about the UDRP?
We could ask ICANN to send WIPO a clue, but do they have any to spare?
Get active: http://www.domain-owners.org http://www.tldlobby.com
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|