<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] On Motions
On 12:27 22/04/01, babybows.com said:
>First you bring in more members, then you work, then you motion, then you
>vote. If you have good recommendations, suggestions, you do not need a
>motion to put them forth.
IMHO that wording and conceptions are inapproriate to the management of the
DNSO/GA ML. In order to help our Chairs to be advised on the best way to
proceed on his difficult matter:
"
I motion that the WG-Review initiated Center of Interest ML on consensus
uncovering, ML management methods, net-democracy, transparency, etc...
is activated.with the purpose of presenting iCANN wide propositions.
"
Jefsey
PS I also propose that those interested in joining or monitoring that list
let it
know to the GA, so we may jointly better asses the maturation of this idea.
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|