Re: [ga] Repost: InternetStakeholders.com

[Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>]

Sotiris, JOanna, Danny and all remaining assembly members,

  I must admit that this situation looks a little odd.  It would seem
that such a list should have been announced on the DNSO GA
List and the DNSO Announce list if it is an official ML for the
DNSO GA or any Working Group (WG) for the DNSO.

  I would personally urge that the DNSO GA list Chair do so
as soon as possible if their are no objections and a motion is
pending for this "YAHOO WG-Review list".  If not possibly
a motion should be introduced...  ????

Sotiris wrote:

> (sorry if this is duplicated, but the original posting did not seem to
> get through, and i think this warrants another look)
>
> All,
>
> I find it disturbing that Joanna Lane was encouraged to go ahead and
> create a rogue mailing list by the current Chair of the GA, particularly
> as she made use of a DNSO mailing list to sign the Members of the WG
> Review up for a yahoo list which has nothing to do with the DNSO per
> se.  Pease consider the following message which was originally forwarded
> to Jefsey Morfin, Kendall Dawson, and myself, by Joanna on April 21
> *without* any PRIVATE/OFFLIST/CONFIDENTIAL notice:
>
> on 4/20/01 6:02 PM, babybows.com at webmaster@babybows.com wrote:
>
> > Dear Joanna,
> A separate ML through InternetStakeholders.com
> > strikes me as an excellent idea, as the more members of the public that are
> > drawn into ICANN-related matters... so much healthier will ICANN become.
> > I see an immediate role for
> > InternetStakeholders.com which may well go far beyond your expectations...
> > the GA needs a better-designed official website than what they currently
> > have.  You and Kendall and Sotiris have the capability to create a prototype
> > GA website for consideration by the whole of the GA.    If the whole of the
> > GA by resolution and ratification agrees that what you have created as a GA
> > prototype is appropriate to the needs of the organization, we can move
> > forward to having a link placed on the ICANN site to direct traffic to the
> > new GA website.  Just a thought, but lets face it... the GA portion of the
> > site on www.ICANN.org really sucks.
>
> With all due respect, Mr. Chair, what's all this about a GA website
> outside ICANN?
>
> (for those of you who were unwittingly subscribed to the yahoogroups
> list entitled "DNSO Work Group Review" as listed at
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/wg-review ,  I urge you to compare the
> message quoted above with the message apparently posted by Joanna Lane
> in response to Rod Dixon's questions about whether or not the list had
> been sanctioned by the NC)
>
> Regards,
>
> Sotiris Sotiropoulos
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

Regards,

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 118k members strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number:  972-447-1800 x1894 or 214-244-4827
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208


--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html