Re: [ga] Appendix U

[Eric Dierker <ERIC@HI-TEK.COM>]

Do either of you fine gentlemen have a reason, other than competition with other
TLDs, for this agreement you have reached?

Why should ICANN care about how well New.net does unless we have reached a bottoms
up consensus that we want to compete against it rather than cooperate with it and
fulfill our contract with the DoC?

This whole line of thought is tantamount to agreeing to breach our contract.

Sincerely,

"William X. Walsh" wrote:

> Hello Kent,
>
> Monday, April 30, 2001, 10:25:55 PM, Kent Crispin wrote:
> >> At a time when organizations like New.net are entering many new TLDs into
> >> the market and solidifying relationships with ISPs, we need to be concerned
> >> about actions on our part that would further delay the entry of future ICANN
> >> TLDs.
>
> > We need to be more concerned about the quick introduction of the
> > already approved ones.
>
> On this point, I must wholeheartedly agree with Kent.
>
> --
> Best regards,
> William X Walsh
> mailto:william@userfriendly.com
> Owner, Userfriendly.com
> Userfriendly.com Domains
> The most advanced domain lookup tool on the net
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html