<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] Re: Suspension of Voting Rights
On 1 May 2001, at 19:33, Kent Crispin wrote:
> On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 10:15:16AM +1200, Joop Teernstra wrote:
> > At 08:58 1/05/01 -0700, Kent Crispin wrote:
> >
> > >That would grant 531400 votes to netzero, inc(*), and would radically bias
> > >the voting.
> > >
> >
> > Nobody has ever said that votes should be proportionate to the number of
> > Domain Names held.
> > A strawman argument if I ever saw one.
>
> Sorry, you should read more carefully. Harald said, in the message I
> was replying to, the following:
>
> Another possible form of representation would be to grant domain
> name owners one vote per registered domain name in a
> totally-integrated "domian name owners' constituency".
>
> Note carefully: he said "one vote per registered domain name".
And that means an entity that has 400,000 registered domains has
400,000 votes.
>
> --
> Kent Crispin "Be good, and you will be
> kent@songbird.com lonesome." -- Mark Twain
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|