<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[ga] Re: [ga-review] Individuals' Constituency
- To: ga@dnso.org
- Subject: [ga] Re: [ga-review] Individuals' Constituency
- From: Jefsey Morfin <jefsey@wanadoo.fr>
- Date: Mon, 07 May 2001 00:28:55 +0200
- In-Reply-To: <3AF4F777.38D84443@ix.netcom.com>
- References: <20010506043845.NOOA1717828.mta4-rme.xtra.co.nz@JOOPTEER>
- Sender: owner-ga-full@dnso.org
Dear Jeff,
I think you are wrong using the word "though". It would be more correct to
use the word "because".
On 09:04 06/05/01, Jeff Williams said:
>The ICANN BoD and the NC have made it clear that there is not interest on
>their part for individuals domain name holders to be represented been
>though they represent about 80% of all stakeholders.
And we should once for all accept that and act (not blah, blah) accordingly.
This means listing the different actions we may undertake as a group or as
individuals auto-selected through such a group to react to that situation.
Jefsey
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|