Re: [process2] Re: [ga] WIPO's Best Practices for ccTLDs

["John Berryhill Ph.D. J.D." <john@johnberryhill.com>]

It is not I who is mistaken.  You'll have to take up the argument with WIPO.
In the Interim Report on the Second Domain Name Process WIPO proposes to
regulate the use of International Non-Proprietary Pharmaceutical names
expressly for the purpose of protecting "public health and safety".

So, if protecting public health is not a WIPO mission, then someone is going
to have to inform WIPO.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Kornellius" <kornellius@bol.com.br>
Subject: Re: [process2] Re: [ga] WIPO's Best Practices for ccTLDs


> Unfortunately, you are mistaken. The World INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
> Organization differs from the World HEALTH Organization.
>
>
> -----Mensagem original-----
> De: John Berryhill Ph.D. J.D. <john@johnberryhill.com>
>
>
> >No, you are mistaken.  WIPO also has responsibility for protection of
> public
> >health and safety.  As noted in the report on the subject of INNs, there
is
> >NO intellectual property interest at stake.  The interim report
> specifically
> >states that protection of INNs is within WIPO's mandate to protect public
> >health and safety.
> >
> >John
> >
> >From: "Kornellius" <kornellius@bol.com.br>
> >
> >IMHO, I understand that WIPO has a very particular role in this entire
> >situation, which is safeguarding the interests and rights of the
> intellectual
> >property community.
> >
> >
>
>
>

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html