Re: [ga] MOTION: Request for a GA resolution on an IDN holders' constituency (IC)

[Joop Teernstra <terastra@terabytz.co.nz>]

On 15:50 7/05/01 -0700, Joe Kelsey said:
>I am opposed to any Individual's Constituency which has anything at all
>to do with the non-legitimate so-called IDNO.  Please remove all
>references to this organization.
>

The Name is not important for the Resolution of the GA. 
This is why I speak of an IC.

However, the history cannot be unmade and the history is part of the
considerans.
The archives bear witness to what exactly has been said and done.

Pray tell, what makes a bottom-up self organizing process legitimate in
your eyes?
Only the blessing by the ICANN Board, perhaps? Crises are nothing new in
online organizations. I'm just witnessing another one in MINC.

For clarity, let me repeat the motion itself:

I move that the GA will express its support for the immediate acknowledgement 
of an Individuals' Constituency by the Board in accordance with its Bylaws.

I move that this support will take the form of a GA Resolution recommending
that the Board will  place either the creation of such an IC or the
"approval in
principle" on its Agenda for a decision in Stockholm.

Any seconds for this motion?



-joop


--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html