Re: [ga] What makes a corporation?

[Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>]

Eric and all assembly members,

 Thank you Eric for your acalaids towards myself.  However in actuallity
I am a lowly spokesman for a number of stakeholders and not much more.

Eric Dierker wrote:

> The wonderful part of what you are saying here is the natural truth to it.  These things
> are occuring. Regulation and central control is the farce-witness the Soviet Union as it
> were. When we stop growing we die.  Competition is the dynamic that allows us to remain
> stable in an ever growing alive internet.  Euro-ISPs will recognize the existing dotbiz to
> an overwhelming degree. (citation at request, see ICANN forum)  How can innovation occur
> in a stifled environment? It can but what a waste.  Bless the visionaries who said this
> must be, and curse the technocrats that prohibited it.
>
> Mr. Williams suggestions here are only steering a sinking ship back on it's manifest
> course.
>
> Sincerely, and humbly to be in the cyberpresence of such great people.
>
> Jeff Williams wrote:
>
> > Eric and all assembly members,
> >
> >   Thank you for this well worded endorsement.  I believe you are
> > quite right.  However lately we are seeing a few strong ICANN BoD
> > supporters indicating that "Criminalizing" Competitive Roots or Alt Roots
> > should seriously be considered.  I fine the very thought both astounding
> > and utterly disgusting on it's face, not to mention anti competitive, and in
> > likely violation of the "Fair Competition Act".  As such I don't understand
> > the sane mentality of such a suggestion...
> >
> >   So I conclude the following:
> >
> > 1.) Competition in registry services other than under ICANN's management
> >      to be a healthy thing.
> >
> > 2.) Competition of "Competitive Roots"  to the "Legacy Root" or "USG Root's"
> >      to be a healthy thing.
> >
> > 3.) Cooperation between these other entities to the extent in which they
> >      exist or will exist should be paramount to the stability of the Internet
> >      and more specifically, the DNS.
> >
> > 4.) To contemplate contrary to points 1 thru 3 is in essence anti competitive
> >      in nature and not in the best interests of the stakeholders or the stability
> >      of the Internet as a whole.
> >
> > Eric Dierker wrote:
> >
> > > The presidential directive, the resulting CFR, the later letters of DoC, the entire
> > > contracting and RFP procedures establishing ICANN and wresting power into non-USG
> > > hands, the Green and White papers and the contract with ICANN is so filled with this
> > > correct decision that any rational man, with this knowledge could not possibly reach
> > > a different conclusion lest he be of a larcenous intent.
> > >

Regards,

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 118k members strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number:  972-447-1800 x1894 or 214-244-4827
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208


--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html