<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[ga] Re: ICANN leaves no money for public elections
Chris and all,
How come I am not surprised. This is one way in which to insure that
there is no representation by stakeholders at large. So it seems that
our [INEGRoup's] earlier predictions on the ICANN Membership
study were justified. There basically will not be any.
Chris Chiu wrote:
> In its draft budget for 2001-2002, the Internet Corporation for Assigned
> Names and Numbers has not allocated any funds for At-Large Elections, in
> spite of its past promises to choose at least five more Board members
> through this electoral process.
>
> See
> http://www.internetdemocracyproject.org/#highlights
>
> Sincerely,
> Christopher Chiu
> Global Internet Liberty Campaign Organizer
> American Civil Liberties Union
>
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to ncdnhc-discuss as: Jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-ncdnhc-discuss-1799I@lyris.isoc.org
Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 118k members strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number: 972-447-1800 x1894 or 214-244-4827
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|