<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] Austerity measures AND ga-full
It is real easy;
Our group here violates every tenant of free speech and we all go along. The idea
being all they really restrict is bouncing the messages out to the signed on public
which most lists do not do anyway. That is ok but recently the decided that all
banned people could only be recorded on the ga full. so now they are fully censoring
public input. And that is ok until you review the fact that only those opposed to
the current regime are banned. And that is Ok also, because we are beginning the
road of not caring and therefor spending all of our time elswhere. And that is ok
too if that is what you want to support. Now we have total censorship controlled by
the cochair, and actually that will work because we can define the ga very easily
now.
One Newbie to another,
"William S. Lovell" wrote:
> So clue in a clueless newbie, here, huh? I'd not looked into the ga-full list,
> so when I
> saw this I assumed (not too unreasonably, I hope) that it was a means by which
> one
> could in one fell swoop subscribe to all of the ga lists. So I figured what's
> the big deal?
> -- one subscribes one at a time. But then I looked and find the ga-full list
> characterized
> as follows:
>
> "Those who do not accept the General Assembly list rules may subscribe to
> ga-full list"
>
> That is, those do not want to observe a minimum level of decorum, and so on. So
> now
> I must say even louder, "what's the big deal?" Toning down the rhetorical slash
> and burn
> is tough enough in a list that seeks to follow the rules; why should there be a
> (no doubt
> largely duplicative) list in which it's no holds barred? Clue me in, huh?
>
> Curmudgeon I may be, but in these lists I would propose another yardstick:
> "Would you say it out loud in church? Would you say it in court? Would you
> say it in front of your mother or your eight-year old child?"
>
> (Now that elections bit I see here in another email is quite another kettle of
> fish; that
> needs looked into.)
>
> Bill Lovell
>
> Gene Marsh wrote:
>
> > If this is true, is there ANYONE who will bring up the obvious, that this is
> > a veiled attempt to quiet voices that are unpopular with ICANN?
> >
> > Gene...
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: owner-ga@dnso.org [mailto:owner-ga@dnso.org]On Behalf Of Michael
> > > Froomkin
> > > Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2001 8:39 PM
> > > To: babybows.com
> > > Cc: ga@dnso.org
> > > Subject: Re: [ga] Austerity measures
> > >
> > >
> > > this is a joke, right? how much time does it take to run a mailing list?
> > >
> > > --
> > > Please visit http://www.icannwatch.org
> > > A. Michael Froomkin | Professor of Law | froomkin@law.tm
> > > U. Miami School of Law, P.O. Box 248087, Coral Gables, FL 33124 USA
> > > +1 (305) 284-4285 | +1 (305) 284-6506 (fax) | http://www.law.tm
> > > -->It's hot here.<--
> > >
> > > On Thu, 10 May 2001, babybows.com wrote:
> > >
> > > > Please be advised that in yesterday's NC teleconference, concerns over
> > > > funding and man-hours spent by the DNSO Secretariat in list management
> > > > resulted in the NC recommendation to close the GA-full list.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
> > > > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > > > ("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
> > > > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> > > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > > ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> > >
> >
> > --
> > This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|